Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adams et al v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Chatara Adams, Monica Aguilar, Carol Allen and others
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Haynes v. 3M Company
as 0:2016cv04249
Plaintiff:
Patricia Haynes
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Sebelius et al
as 8:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Williams
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Patricia Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
ALLEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06288
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN, JR. , ESSIE ASHFORD , SOONJ BARTHOLET and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lanning #259428 v. Pandya et al
as 2:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Lanning #259428
Defendant:
Unknown Pandya, Bien Venido Canlis, Margaret Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYNES et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88319
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA HAYNES and PATRICIA HAYNES
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Haynes v. Astrue et al
as 1:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
Patricia Haynes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael B. Mukasey and Lawrence J. Laurenzi
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Haynes et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv00864
Plaintiff:
Patricia Haynes, Harry William Hilton, Vester Lynn Horton and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYNES et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02284
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA HAYNES, HARRY WILLIAM HILTON, VESTER LYNN HORTON and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
