Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Davis v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02642
Petitioner:
Patrick James Davis
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Levon Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wojciechowski v. Howard R. Young Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00596
Defendant:
Howard R. Young Correctional Institution, John Doe and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Wojciechowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brenan v. Silicon Valley Mechanical, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Brenan
Defendant:
Silicon Valley Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
McPartlin v. Miller
as 1:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Patrick James McPartlin
Defendant:
Robert A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moon v. Macke et al
as 4:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Darnell Moon and Darnell W. Moon
Defendant:
Daniel Macke, Kim Bramlett, Charles Doerge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moon v. Bramlett et al
as 4:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Kim Bramlett, Lynn Lyons, Ned Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
KISSEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12825
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JAMES KISSEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURRIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11234
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JAMES CURRIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
