Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Duke v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00408
Plaintiff:
Daniel Austin Duke
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Mike Parris, Alan Bunch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 4:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Paul Lowe and Lauren Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 20-2500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fardrel J. Guice, John Robert Hardin, Wilson M. Dagaye and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Lowe v. South West Virginia Regional Jail Authority
as 3:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lowe
Defendant:
South West Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIver v. V.A. United States et al
as 4:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Shirley Verrette McIver
Defendant:
V.A. United States, Elizabeth Sengstaken, Jennifer Acselrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
USA v. James Lowe
as 14-5615
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES PAUL LOWE
KAPP et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04575
Plaintiff:
JOE KAPP , PAUL LOWE , CRAIG COTTON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joe Kapp et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv05833
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Anderson, Sr., Joseph Beauchamp, David Cadigan and others
Lowe v. Quarterman
as 08-40051
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL LOWE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lowe v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 9:2007cv00237
Petitioner:
Paul Lowe
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
