Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith et al v. Nichols et al
as 0:2021cv02583
Plaintiff:
Joel Smith, John Nesse, Daniel Shoemaker and others
Defendant:
Penny Nichols doing business as Nichols LLC and Nichols LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Nichols v. CEC Facilities Group
as 4:2021cv00509
Defendant:
CEC Facilities Group
Plaintiff:
Penni Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Penny Corn, et al v. MS Dept of Public Safety, et al
as 19-60247
Defendant / Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ALBERT SANTA CRUZ, Individually and in his official capacity as former Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety and MARSHALL FISHER, In his official capacity as Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TWYLA JENNINGS and PENNY NICHOLS CORN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2011dp21486
Plaintiff:
Penny Nichols
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Penny Nichols
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Penny et al
as 4:2007cv04011
Plaintiff:
James B. Moore
Defendant:
Warden Griffen, Warden Griffen, Penny Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thiel v. Griffen et al
as 4:2007cv04004
Plaintiff:
Jean Paul Thiel
Defendant:
Warden Griffen, Warden Griffen, Jerry Stringfellow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
