Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
David Nail v. Brent Myer
as 16-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM NAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT MYERS
Defendant:
PENNY ADAMS, et al.
David Nail v. Autumn Schrauben, et al
as 16-1410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM NAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTUMN SCHRAUBEN, an individual, PENNY ADAMS, an individual, AMIE HUTCHINS, an individual and others
Defendant:
BRENT OESTERBLAD, an individual, et al.
David Nail v. Autumn Schrauben, et al
as 16-1279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM NAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTUMN SCHRAUBEN, an individual, PENNY ADAMS, an individual, AMIE HUTCHINS, an individual and others
Defendant:
BRENT OESTERBLAD, an individual, et al.
Nail v. Schrauben et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
David William Nail
Defendant:
Autumn Schrauben, Penny Adams, Amie Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-21650
Plaintiff:
Penny Adams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Adams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21650
Plaintiff:
Penny Adams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nail v. Myers et al
as 1:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
David W. Nail
Defendant:
Brent Myers, Penny Adams, Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn et al v. Groves et al
as 6:2009cv03019
Plaintiff:
Alton Louis Vaughn, Sr. and Christopher Vaughn
Defendant:
Penni Adams Groves, Vicki Mattocks, Michael T. Nietzel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCLAIN v. FINNEN et al
as 2:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
JOE HOWARD MCCLAIN
Defendant:
ALAN FINNEN, PENNY ADAM and JIM WYNN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
