Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2016cv00071
Defendant:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. and Brandon L Phelps
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Burnett v. Champion Marketing Corp. et al
as 6:2015cv06620
Defendant:
Champion Marketing Corp. and Chauncey Phelps
Plaintiff:
Loretta Burnett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grady et al v. CenturyLink Communications, LLC
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derek H. Virkus, Gail L. Sherrick, Alma Natalia Noot and others
Defendant:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ghee v. Regional Medical Center Board et al
as 1:2015cv01430
Plaintiff:
M Douglas Ghee
Defendant:
Regional Medical Center Board , USAble Mutual Insurance Company , The Crawford Clinic, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jacoby v. Kahala Franchise Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacoby
Defendant:
Kahala Franchise Corporation, Elite Dining Group LLC, Premier Dining Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Phelps v. MultiCare Health System
as 3:2015cv05120
Plaintiff:
Tanya Phelps
Defendant:
MultiCare Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bryan et al v. Directv Inc et al
as 5:2014cv03063
Plaintiff:
Chester Bryan , Demetrius Gardner , Aduastic George and others
Defendant:
Directv Inc, Directv L L C and Multiband Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harvill v. Phelps County Restaurant
as 4:2014cv01444
Plaintiff:
Lucas Harvill
Defendant:
Phelps County Restaurant LLC and Chris Morgan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Phelps v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2014cv01339
Plaintiff:
John Phelps
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Phelps v. City of Parma et al
as 1:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Teresa L Phelps
Defendant:
City of Parma , Craig Telford , Albert Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
