Cases 1 - 10 of 36,517
PHILLIPS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00784
Petitioner:
ASHLEY PHILLIPS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Ledkins v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Ledkins
Defendant:
Mayor Jerry Jackson, Jeremy Ragland, Mitch Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Sacramento Department of Child Support Services et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael St. Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Sacramento Department of Child Support Services, Lisa Smith, Merced County Department of Child Support Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Palmer
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Durelle Palmer individually and d/b/a Big Phil's Soul & Creole Cafe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips et al v. Dream Chasers Carter LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Phillips and Gayle Glass Phillips
Defendant:
Dream Chasers Carter LLC and Djimon Dante Duvall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Newsome et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lee Smith
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tallent v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02506
Plaintiff:
Phillip Douglas Tallent
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
