Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Piyush Patel v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1420
Petitioner:
USHA PIYUSH KUMAR PATEL and PIYUSH KUMAR AMRITBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Paniha, Inc., et al v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Paniha, Inc., a Florida Corporation d/b/a A & M Discount Beverage #22, Piyush V. Patel and Paniha, Inc. a Florida Corporation doing business as A&M Discount Beverage #22
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATEL v. HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 4:2020cv00169
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
PIYUSH KUMAR PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piyush Patel v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60892
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
PIYUSH MATHURBHAI PATEL, also known as Paresh Patel
PARIS v. ASTHA LAXMI LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00561
Defendant:
ASTHA LAXMI LLC and Piyush J Patel
Plaintiff:
Wilma Paris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
D'Souza v. Patel, et al
as 1:2016cv00176
Defendant:
Jigisha Piyush Patel, Piyush Kanubhai Patel and Pujari, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marina Marshall D'Souza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bergeron v. Rhode Island Center for Performing Arts, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Bergeron
Defendant:
Rhode Island Center for Performing Arts, Inc. and Piyush J. Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SUPRATEK PHARMA, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
SUPRATEK PHARMA, INC.
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC. , MICHAEL L. CAPPOLA , PIYUSH R. PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zuffa, LLC v. Patel et al
as 2:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Piyush A. Patel and PLK 10, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
