Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DAVILA, JR. v. OCEAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2026cv12116
Plaintiff:
EMILIANO DAVILA, JR.
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DENNIS MITCHELL, MEGHAN O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ector Jr v. Ross et al
as 2:2026cv03169
Plaintiff:
Ralph M Ector Jr
Defendant:
R. Ross, Memphis Police Department, General Sessions Court of Shelby County; and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
as 1:2026cv11434
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. MARTIN
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Dinkelacker et al
as 1:2026cv00874
Plaintiff:
James Wooten
Defendant:
Leah Judge Dinkelacker, Hamilton County, Ohio, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office EMU Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fredrick Buford v. Jeffrey Getting, et al
as 26-1728
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK LEDELL BUFORD
Defendant:
JEFFREY SCOTT GETTING, District Attorney/Prosecutor, official capacity and KALAMAZOO COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, named as Prosecutor's Office Kalamazoo County of Michigan, Assistant Prosecutors, Prosecutor's Assistant(s), official capacity
Hall v. Allen County Prosecutors Office
as 1:2026cv00391
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Hall
Defendant:
Allen County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
