Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Tonkin v. Putt Pro X LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Dean Tonkin
Defendant:
Putt Pro X LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
UNIFIED FINANCIAL SECURITIES, INC. v. COHICK et al
as 5:2015cv01015
Plaintiff:
UNIFIED FINANCIAL SECURITIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRUCE COHICK , LISA COHICK , GREGORY SPADAFORE and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Putt et al v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC
as 4:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
SHEILA PUTT and BRIAN MARK WEBB
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Putt et al v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC
as 0:2014cv04920
Plaintiff:
Sheila Putt and Brian Mark Webb
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orlando Rodriguez v. Michael Crum, et al
as 14-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Debtor - Appellee:
NATIONAL FREIGHT INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CRUM, DALLAS FOARD, KAROL KEMPKE and others
Orlando Rodriguez v. National Freight Inc, et al
as 14-1748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL FREIGHT INC, MICHAEL CRUM, DALLAS FOARD and others
Putt et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04398
Plaintiff:
Sheila Putt and Brian Mark Webb
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Luh v. Fulton State Hospital et al
as 2:2013cv04189
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Fulton State Hospital, John Lyskowski, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. National Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rodriguez
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc., Michael Crum, Dallas Foard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
