Cases 91 - 100 of 364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
State of Michigan Sixth Judicial Circuit Court et al v. El Davis
as 2:2018cv12936
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of, Quicken Loans, Inc., Trott Law, P.C. and others
Defendant:
Noble Marcus El Davis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. Turman et al
as 3:2018cv01502
Defendant:
Connie Sout, Jacob D. Cronin, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cardenas v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 4:2018cv02827
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Majeske v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2018cv12403
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Quicken Loans and Affiliated Companies Welfare Benefits Plan and Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jill Majeske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Perkins v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 3:2018cv04901
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Anne Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Amador v. Quicken Loans Inc., et al
as 18-16331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL AMADOR
Defendant - Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and others
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Fox et al
as 6:2018cv00925
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Dorinda Fox , Nationstar Mortgage LLC , Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bakko et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 0:2018cv01566
Plaintiff:
Mary Bakko and Dawn White
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
