Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Hi-Vac Corporation et al v. Coley et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Plaintiff:
Hi-Vac Corporation and Alliance Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel J Coley, Matthew D Greenwold, Randy J DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chiles v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03029
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Chiles
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Sergeant Heigler, Officer Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullard v. Coley et al
as 5:2022ct03005
Plaintiff:
William Domonic Bullard
Defendant:
R. Coley, D. Joyner, Stephen Fonville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faith International Adoptions et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2018cv00731
Plaintiff:
Faith International Adoptions , Amazing Grace Adoptions and Adopt Abroad Incorporated
Defendant:
Michael R. Pompeo , Carl C. Risch , Theodore R. Coley and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Coley v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10672
Plaintiff:
Connie R. Coley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FUNDERBURK v. COLEY et al
as 1:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JAKIERRA FUNDERBURK
Defendant:
R. COLEY and GARY SELLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley v. Cuyahoga County Council et al
as 1:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Coley
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Council , Ed Fitzgerald , James Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Coley et al
as 6:2014cv00015
Defendant:
Judge Gary R. Coley and United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Cory Dewayne Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
