Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Joseph Mays v. T. Smith
as 20-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HALFAST, Case Manager, OFFICER SLAYDON, OFFICER GLASS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martin v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Sherry R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 5:2020ct03064
Defendant:
Patterson, Judge Charles J. Siragusa, M.C.J. Lt. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Warden J. C. Holland, Dr. Gillespie Wadsworth and Counselor Mrs. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Cynthia R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02547
Plaintiff:
Charles R Martin
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. Smith et al
as 5:2018ct03186
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, S. Ma'at, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wheeler v. Vargus et al
as 5:2018ct03044
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Wheeler
Defendant:
Lt. Vargus, Brian Castle, Dr. Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. USA - 2255
as 1:2018cv00103
Petitioner:
Curtis R. Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 3:2017cv01843
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 2:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
