Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Newman v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Newman
Defendant:
S. Smith and CO Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWMAN v. ASTRUE
as 3:2012cv00094
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
WENDEE R NEWMAN and SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galt Ocean Manor Condominium Association, Inc. v. Newman et al
as 0:2011cv61715
Plaintiff:
Galt Ocean Manor Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
John R. Newman , Jacqueline Newman , Catherine Brownell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv12340
Plaintiff:
Lynn R. Newman
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Compass Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Melloian, Jr., Robert L Lowe, Janice Lucas and others
Defendant:
Compass USA SPE, LLC, Compass USA GP, LLC, SMOF A, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Trustee John L. Andersen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Farb v. Baldwin Union Free School
as 10-2215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Harold R. Newman
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Cheryl E. Farb
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Baldwin Union Free School District, Baldwin Union Free School District Board of Education and James Brown, in his official capacity as Principal and individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
