Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Stein v. Cincinnati Bell Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01282
Defendant:
Martin J. Yudkovitz, Leigh R. Fox, Craig F. Maier and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00200
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
(HC) Brooks v. Fox
as 2:2019cv00879
Petitioner:
Harold B Brooks and Harold B. Brooks
Respondent:
R. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fox v. Warden
as 2:2019cv00901
Petitioner:
Lewis R. Fox
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: PennEast Pipeline Co LLC
as 19-1228
Defendant:
CYRUS R. FOX INC, TOWNSHIP OF DELAWARE, COUNTY OF HUNTERDON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
In re: PENNEAST PIPELINE CO LLC
Undetermined:
NEW JERSEY STATE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Fox et al v. Kleski et al
as 3:2019cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Fox and Barbara Fox
Defendant:
Kreig F. Kleski and Jennifer C. Chapman Kleski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adam S. Ramirez v. R. Fox
as 2:2019cv00152
Petitioner:
Adam S. Ramirez
Respondent:
R. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Draper v. R. Fox, et al
as 18-55689
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN CLINT DRAPER
Respondent - Appellee:
R. FOX, Warden, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Vidurek et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
Cerus Maarten, Michelle Frioco, Michael Anthony Livecche, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Assemblyman Carl E. Heastie and John J. Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Clint Draper v. State of California Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2018cv02282
Petitioner:
John Clint Draper
Respondent:
R. Fox, State of California Board of Parole Hearings and The Supreme Court of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
