Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wright v. Machine Entertainment Group LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04911
Plaintiff:
Herbert Randall Wright, III
Defendant:
Machine Entertainment Group LLC and Joseph Bowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
NoNaNi Entertainment, LLC. v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01829
Plaintiff:
NoNaNi Entertainment, LLC.
Defendant:
Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., Tremani Bartlett, Herbert Randall Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wright v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05440
Plaintiff:
Randall Wright
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Dale Aviation, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00831
Plaintiff:
Joe Randall Wright
Defendant:
Dale Aviation, Inc. doing business as Medical Air Rescue Company and Engage Employer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas Boyd v. Duncan Culpepper, et al
as 19-3539
Defendant / Appellee:
Prosecutor Traci Graham, Prosecuting Attorney, Bo Morris, Officer/Deputy, Deputy Simmons, Parole and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Waylon Boyd
Boyd v. Culpepper et al
as 4:2019cv04077
Defendant:
Tim McBrayer, Matthew Ford, Officer Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waylon Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Culpepper et al
as 4:2019cv00462
Defendant:
Tim McBrayer, Matthew Ford, Justin Hurst and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waylon Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01292
Plaintiff:
Randall Wright and Brenda Wright
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gay v. Roberts et al
as 4:2016cv04034
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Gay, Sr.
Defendant:
Steven Roberts, Thomas Allgood, Tony Yocom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vele v. Wright, et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Dennis Neil Vele
Defendant:
Randall Wright, Randall Geise, Stephen P Burroughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
