Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Scott, Randy v. Lavoie, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Randy Keith Scott
Defendant:
Daniel L. Lavoie and Nicole Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarman v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Randy Keith Jarman
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee and Unknown Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WHITE et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13902
Plaintiff:
RANDY KEITH WHITE, JR. and ASHLEY WHITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burkhalter v. City of East Ridge et al
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Burkhalter
Defendant:
City of East Ridge, Beth Hickman Individual Capacity doing business as Sugar Plum also known as Sugar Plum Antiques and Treasures, Randall W. Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hunter v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, The, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Keith Hunter, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv21074
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
RANDY KEITH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv03244
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY KEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Randy Jones
as 18-11546
Petitioner:
In re: RANDY KEITH JONES
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
King v. Ryals et al
as 4:2017cv00709
Plaintiff:
Randy Keith King, II
Defendant:
Tim Ryals and Henry Poindexter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
