Cases 1 - 10 of 2,774
Moon v. Clinton Reilly Communications
as 5:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Jeenah Moon
Defendant:
Clinton Reilly Communications
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
REILLY v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS REILLY
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ridgely Conlan v. Richard Reilly et al
as 2:2024cv03002
Plaintiff:
Ridgely Conlan
Defendant:
Richard Reilly, Trent Thurber and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Reilly v. Suitebriar, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bevan Reilly
Defendant:
Suitebriar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ladenburger v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Robert Reilly Ladenburger
Respondent:
State of South Dakota and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Reilly v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
KEITH REILLY
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
