Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Auguste et al v. Synchrony Bank
as 1:2019cv00087
Petitioner:
Diana Burton, Richard Rose, Leah Azu and others
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
ROSE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROSE
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv04759
Plaintiff:
Richard Rose
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LeFever et al v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lefever, Robert Cummings, Daniel Greatwater and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROSE et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04989
Plaintiff:
REBECCA ROSE and RICHARD ROSE
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02120
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Durango Jail
Plaintiff:
Eric Richard Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. TRI-STAR FORD, INC.
as 2:2017cv00781
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROSE
Defendant:
TRI-STAR FORD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moors et al v. The City of Lakeland, Florida et al
as 8:2015cv01819
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Moors and Judy L. Moors
Defendant:
City of Lakeland, Florida , Richard Rose and John Does
Movant:
Harold Lehman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Richard Rose and Maria Rose
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23675
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Rose and Richard Rose
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
