Cases 1 - 10 of 4,531
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Carl Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff:
CARL E. RODGERS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JEFFREY STINE, DEAN SHIPE and others
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Fosbinder v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Rodger Fosbinder
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Janet Elaine Patterson and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
MAROCHEK-RODGERS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. et al
as 3:2024cv05393
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LYNN MAROCHEK-RODGERS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Puma v. Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02858
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Puma
Defendant:
Rog & Chrissy Trucking Inc. and Rodger Haye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Rodgers et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Clovis D. Rodgers and Jennifer Rodgers
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
