Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Salehe et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00374
Plaintiff: Sam Salehe , Juan Aponte , Nathan Baldwin and others
Defendant: Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Joyner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00420
Petitioner: Rodney Jones
Respondent: FNU Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salehe et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00361
Plaintiff: Sam Salehe , Juan Aponte , Nathan Baldwin and others
Defendant: G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2014cv05106
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Officer Reyes, OfficeMueller and others
Plaintiff: Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GLUNT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01153
Petitioner: CURTIS RODNEY JONES
Respondent: GLUNT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4724
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodney Jones v. R. Barne
as 13-57119
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY JONES
Respondent - Appellee: R. BARNES
US v. Terryonto McGrier We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-7103
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TERRYONTO MCGRIER, a/k/a Rodney Jones
Jones v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 1:2013cv01771
Plaintiff: Rodney Jones
Defendant: Baltimore City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Solomon et al
as 5:2013ct03111
Plaintiff: Rodney Jones
Defendant: George T. Solomon, Roger Moon, Duane Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?