Cases 1 - 10 of 34,191
Marshall v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Clifford Marshall
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Danny Roe, Sgt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobley v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Terrell Onterial Lobley
Respondent:
Don Harris
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
Yvette Rogers
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Okorie v. University Mall, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
University Mall, LLC, Joseph R. Tullos, James Poncho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dunlap v. Knox County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Davis Dunlap
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Department, Roger D Wilson Detention Facility and C Tuell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Leishman v. Washington Office of the Attorney General, et al.
as 24-2509
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEISHMAN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, SHANE ESQUIBEL, ELIZABETH CHRISTINA BEUSCH and others
Rogers et al v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 5:2024cv02360
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rogers and Jason Fong
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santa Fe Public Schools Board of Education v. Rogers et al.
as 1:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Santa Fe Public Schools Board of Education
Respondent:
Rosangela Rogers and James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
DURBIN v. LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP
as 2:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
ROGER DURBIN
Defendant:
LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
