Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ronald Chapman v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD CHAPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Christopher Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04990
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00776
Plaintiff:
Adams, Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Cafarelle v. Yazwinski et al
as 1:2021cv10230
Defendant:
H Williams Arleas, III, Michael Kryzanek, Ronald Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Cafarelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66943
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00380
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ronald Chapman and Sheila Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman et al v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
Terri Chapman and Ronald Chapman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Chapman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07160
Plaintiff:
Katie D. Chapman and Ronald Chapman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell v. Kodicek
as 2:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Chase Richard Caldwell
Defendant:
Michelle Kodicek and Ronald Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
