Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sissac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Candace Murphy Sissac
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Conniff v. Johns
as 5:2011hc02162
Petitioner:
Ronald Francis Conniff
Respondent:
Tracy W. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conniff v. Johns
as 1:2011cv00786
Petitioner:
Ronald Francis Conniff
Respondent:
Tracy W. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Croteau v. The Trustee to the Chief Administrator of the Municipal Court et al
as 2:2011cv00296
Defendant:
The Trustee to the Chief Administrator of the Municipal Court, Elisabeth Adams, Jay B Rosmans and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis Croteau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryant et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04446
Plaintiff:
Jamel Binyard, Lydia Bryant, Ronald Francis and others
Defendant:
Timothy Erwig, Police Officers John Does 1-5 and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis et al v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC
as 2:2010cv03015
Plaintiff:
April Francis , Ronald Francis and Arona Francis
Defendant:
Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Holland et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv00763
Plaintiff:
Brenda Holland, Toni Roseboro, Ronald Francis and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Raymond Gordon and John Does 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PUKSAR v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv03720
Petitioner:
RONALD FRANCIS PUKSAR
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS B. FOLINO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
Wroblewski #247079 v. Hargrave
as 1:2007cv01144
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis Wroblewski #247079, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Hargrave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
