Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: Steven Ray Wood
Defendant: James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Sullivan
as 3:2023cv03456
Plaintiff: Ray Woods
Defendant: Lt. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods #213457 v. Gomez
as 2:2023cv00823
Plaintiff: Timothy Ray Woods
Defendant: Unknown Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Hill
as 22-8034
Petitioner / Appellant: CLINTON RAY WOODS
Respondent / Appellee: PETER K. MICHAEL, in his official capacity as Wyoming Attorney General and BRIDGET HILL, in his official capacity as Wyoming Attorney General
Wood v. Sweet et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00496
Plaintiff: Steven Ray Wood
Defendant: Rowdy Sweet, Aaron Swatzal and Shane Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Sweet et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00274
Plaintiff: Steven Ray Wood
Defendant: Roudy Sweet, Aaron Swatzal, Shane Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Defendant: Unknown Harrison, Paul Penzone, Unknown Hovsepian and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Ray Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Barrera et al
as 5:2020cv00029
Defendant: NFN Britt, NFN Barrera and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff: Carl Ray Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 2:2019cv00094
Respondent: Wyoming Attorney General and Peter K Michael
Petitioner: Clinton Ray Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Ballard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00130
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Ray Woods
Defendant: Mr. Dixon, David Ballard, Mr. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?