Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Raymond Harris v. Eddie Buffaloe, Jr.
as 22-6951
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety
HARRIS v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00236
Petitioner:
RAYMOND HARRIS
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAYMOND HARRIS v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00244
Petitioner:
RAYMOND HARRIS
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Clark
as 1:2021cv00363
Petitioner:
Raymond Harris
Respondent:
Demetrius A. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harry v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant:
K. Cosby, Ivan Gilmore, E. Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #586446 v. Corl et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Unknown Sisso, Unknown Ogle, Unknown Bleedlove and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harris #586446, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILEY v. SUPERINTENDANT, SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2018cv01671
Petitioner:
RAYMOND HARRY MILEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT, SCI SOMERSET, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miley v. Superintendant, SCI Somerset et al
as 1:2018cv00715
Petitioner:
Raymond Harry Miley
Respondent:
Superintendant, SCI Somerset and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Ryals
as 4:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harris
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Chris Reidmiller, Gary Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harris
Defendant:
David Reynolds, Susan K Weaver, Chris Reidmiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
