Cases 11 - 20 of 42
THOMPSON v. UNILIN NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNILIN NORTH AMERICA, LLC and MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Thompson v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2017cv06218
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Petitioner:
Raymond Thompson
Cedric Nickerson v. TDCJ Inst Div, et al
as 13-40287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, GUILLERMO DELAROSA, STEPHEN FARQUHAR and others
Thompson v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02071
Petitioner:
Michael Raymond Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nickerson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2012cv00761
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, Guillermo Delarosa, Stephen Farquhar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ty Raymond Thompson, et al., v Protective Insurance Co, et al.,
as 1:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ty Raymond Thompson and Melissa Thompson
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Co and Baldwin & Lyons Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson, Jr v. Pajor et al
as 2:2012cv11986
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thompson, Jr
Defendant:
Detroit Police Offic Pajor and Detroit Police Offic Mott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Nickerson v. Guillermo Delarosa, et al
as 12-40446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GUILLERMO DELAROSA, STEPHEN FARQUHAR, DONALD DEAN and others
Nickerson v. Delarosa et al
as 6:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
Guillermo Delarosa, Stephen Farquhar, Donald Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Thompson v. McDonald
as 12-55181
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MCDONALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
