Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FRANKLIN et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KISHA FRANKLIN and REGINALD FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Reginald Franklin v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 20-16547
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD FRANKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Reginald Franklin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02809
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Reginald Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Reginald Franklin
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Array Information Technology et al
as 1:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Reginald Franklin Jones
Defendant:
Array Information Technology, Cathy Boland and Stewart Kidston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Franklin v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00613
Petitioner:
Reginald Franklin
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 4:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Reginald Franklin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Franklin v. Thaler
as 3:2011cv00413
Petitioner:
Reginald Franklin, III
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
