Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant:
MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Alicia Bryant and Alicia Renee Bryant
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bryant v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Karen Renee Bryant
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bryant v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04919
Plaintiff:
Rene Bryant
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
as 1:2020cv06933
Plaintiff:
Renee Bryant
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morris-Shea Bridge Company Inc et al v. Bryant
as 2:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
Morris-Shea Bridge Company Inc and Richard J Shea, III
Defendant:
Kelly Renee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Bryant v. USA
as 5:2012cv00417
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Belinda Renee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cynthia Renee Bryant et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv06387
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Renee Bryant and Dorothy Bryant
Defendant:
Does and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
