Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Gray v. Polis et al
as 1:2020cv00857
Defendant:
Candace Werth, Jared (I) S. Polis, Daniel (I) W. Carr and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Gray, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32411
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROBERT GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Collado v. Gray
as 2:2019cv05911
Defendant:
Robert Gray
Plaintiff:
Harry Bosco Collado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray et al v. City of Denham Springs et al
as 3:2019cv00889
Defendant:
City of Denham Springs, City of Denham Springs Police Department, J Shannon Womack and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Issac Gray, Jacob Gray and Robert Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03787
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRAY and BARBARA GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Gray, Jr. v. Erik Hooks
as 19-6451
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBERT GRAY, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01579
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gray v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03061
Defendant:
Eric Hooks and Larry Dail
Plaintiff:
William Robert Gray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gray et al
as 4:2019cv00440
Defendant:
Daniel A Gray, Robert Gray and John
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
