Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Smith v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Robert Taylor, Annie Johnson, Marshall L. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Robert Taylor, Annie Johnson, Marshall L. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT TAYLOR, PAT MCCRORY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv02444
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CURRAN-FROM HOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sides v. Fisher et al
as 6:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Sides
Defendant:
Stacy Fisher, Beryl Bailey, Kevin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00079
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parks v. Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Christy Denise Johnson, Neil Robert Taylor, Bull Head Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv01111
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv00348
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, GILBERT, GRIFFEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
