Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bartok et al v. McCabe et al
as 7:2026cv00096
Plaintiff:
Peter Bartok
Defendant:
Gregory McCabe, John Brda, Robert L. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Stefannie Dyson v. Cook County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 25-2909
Plaintiff:
STEFANNIE DYSON
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ROBERT BALANOFF, Cook County Judge Bob, COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUVENILE JUSTICE CHILD PROTECTION DIVISION and others
Cook v. Ringham
as 0:2025cv03349
Petitioner:
Robert L. Cook, SR
Respondent:
Mary Ringham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Targgart v. Next Bridge Hydrocarbons
as 25-10879
Plaintiff:
Todd Targgart
Defendant:
Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Incorporated, George Palikaras, Robert L. Cook and others
Byrum v. Bush et al
as 1:2025cv00694
Defendant:
Kenneth Brimer, J. E. Brown, Robert L. Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Byrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2024cv03548
Defendant:
Securities & Exchange Commission, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Albert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Targgart v. Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00767
Defendant:
Delvina Oelkers, Gregory McCabe, Kristin Whitley and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Targgart
Petitioner:
Steven Martinez and Mohammed Limon
Pretrial Service:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
John Pendarvis v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6654
Defendant:
RHETT HOLDEN, Agent/employee of SLED, JOHN NEALE, Agent/employee of SLED, JASON WELLS, Captain for SLEDs Narcotics division and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TRENTON PENDARVIS
Strege v. Charles Schwab
as 24-10525
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Equifax, Incorporated, BMO Bank, Bank America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
