Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Charles Brooks v. Bryan Morrison
as 22-1299
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ROGER BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Brooks v. Joerns Healthcare, LLC (TV1)
as 2:2020cv00224
Plaintiff:
Roger Brooks
Defendant:
Joerns Healthcare, LLC
Morales et al v. Solar Bear Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv21992
Defendant:
DOUGLAS PERERA, JR., DOUGLAS PERERA, SR, Elite HVAC Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Yosbel Milian, Elieser Perez, Michelle Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
LOPEZ et al v. Solar Bear Services LLC et al
as 1:2019cv25155
Defendant:
DOUGLAS PERERA, JR., DOUGLAS PARTNERS, LLC, AIR PROS BLUE STAR, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ELOY BURGUES, LAZARO LOPEZ, LAZARO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins et al v. Halas et al
as 3:2018cv01081
Defendant:
Tony Maher, Roger Brooks, Melissa Morrill and others
Plaintiff:
Moore Bail Bonds, LLC and Yvonne Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 4:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roger Brooks
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11636
Plaintiff:
Roger Brooks
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pharmacia & UpJohn Company Inc and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ALMOND et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06311
Plaintiff:
SARAH ALMOND , EDWARD ANDERSON , DAWN BARKSDALE and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv02788
Plaintiff:
Maureen Gregory
Defendant:
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Roger Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
