Cases 21 - 30 of 7,529
White v. Lucero, et al
as 24-2035
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON WHITE
Defendant:
ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, New Mexico Corrections Department, in her individual capacity, JOE LYTLE, New Mexico Corrections Department, in his individual capacity, MELISSA ORTIZ, New Mexico Corrections Department, in her individual capacity and others
Cindy Washington v. Michael Romero, et al
as 24-11358
Plaintiff:
CINDY ELAINE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROMERO, SUZE SUSALINE, MICHELLE BAPTISTE and others
Washington v. Romero et al
as 6:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Cindy Elaine Washington
Defendant:
Michael Romero, Suze Susaline, Michelle Baptiste and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Bean, et al.
as 24-2705
Plaintiff:
DAVID L REED
Defendant:
BEAN, Associate Warden, Lt GLENN FOWLER, JAMES DZURENDA, Director and others
Romero v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11157
Plaintiff:
Jessica Romero
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas #684159 v. Jurva et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Romero Monte Thomas #684159
Defendant:
Leland Jurva, Mark Skytta, Nicholas Lanctot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-2655
Petitioner:
MARIA ROMERO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Romero v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Romero, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
