Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Johnson et al v. Canopius US Insurance, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05019
Plaintiff:
Rose Mary Johnson and Morris Bart, LLC
Defendant:
Canopius US Insurance, Inc., Quicken Mortgage, LLC, Rocket Mortgage, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. Estate of Roosevelt Baldwin et al
as 1:2014cv02515
Plaintiff:
United States of America, on Behalf of its Agency, Secretary of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
Estate of Roosevelt Baldwin, Estate of Alberta Baldwin, Roosevelt Baldwin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2011cv14644
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dale Gordon Johnson and Rose Marie Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Administration Medical Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00464
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Johnson, Rose Marie Johnson and Rose Marie Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
OVERMAN v. KING et al
as 1:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARVIN OVERMAN, JR.
Defendant:
KING, ROSE MARY JOHNSON, DONALD MICKLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
