Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Routh v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Randal Routh
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Routh v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Adrian S. Routh
Defendant:
State of Iowa and Iowa Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROUTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34663
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROUTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROUTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09181
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J ROUTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Routh v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00173
Petitioner:
Jessica Marie Routh
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Van M. Plumb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Desantis
as 23-10485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Franklin C. Smith, as next friend Taya Kyle
Defendant / Appellee:
Ron Desantis, Governor, Benjamin Crump, Jason L. Jones, Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bell v. Precythe, et al
as 6:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Conrad Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Desantis et al
as 6:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Ron Desantis, Benjamin Crump, Jason L Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
