Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Moore v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore and Roy J Moore
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Chuck Graham, Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Does
as 4:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivery v. Lavicky Sand Co Inc et al
as 4:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Almaz Carlo Ivery
Defendant:
Lavicky Sand Co., Inc., Tommy Roy Moore and Lavicky Sand Co Inc
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00978
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Merz et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv07268
Plaintiff:
Nina Catacessi, Madolyn Uriu, Anthony Dlugos and others
Defendant:
The Vons Companies, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, incorrectly designated as Doe 2, Kaiser Permanente International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Saul
as 4:2020cv06712
Plaintiff:
timothy roy moore
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Eric S Davis, John H Davis and Shelia D Davis
Defendant:
EDWARD L ALLEY, ROY MOORE, DOUGLAS L PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
