Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Baker v. Bell Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 6:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Glenn S. Baker
Defendant:
Bell Co. Sheriff Dept., D.O.C., Bell Co. Forestry Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Seely
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Jeremy Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rune Kraft v. CRH PLC et al
as 2:2021cv09014
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
CRH plc, CRH Americas Incorporated, CRH Americas Materials Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McCoy v. Baker
as 4:2021cv00560
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
S Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11852
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Hopkins, Melinda Tuggle, Tammy O'Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv04856
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MABLE S. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. QEP Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00450
Defendant:
QEP Resources, Inc., Michael J. Minarovic, Barth E. Whitham and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
