Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Moore v. Schneider et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Defendant:
Hasza, J Schneider, D Buss and others
Plaintiff:
Garganus Moore
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert S Woods v. Warden
as 8:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
Robert S Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Woods v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01002
Petitioner:
Robert S Woods and Robert S. Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Andres William Howard
Defendant:
Chatham County, Sheriff Johnny Weltcher, Derek Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headspeth v Akin et al
as 4:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robin Headspeth
Defendant:
N Lane Akin, Brandon S. Wood and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Griffin v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Virgil Eugene Griffin and Virgil Griffin
Defendant:
Nancy Marthakis, Tiffany Turner, Jennifer Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. RAWLEY et al
as 1:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. WOODS
Defendant:
M. RAWLEY and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Gibbs et al
as 6:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Defendant:
Casey Gibbs, M. Carroll, Joseph Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dillard v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Dillard, III
Defendant:
Dawn Lee Tanner, Dexter Payne, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
