Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Debra Curry v. Clayton County Police Department, et al
as 22-11202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA DENISE CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAYTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, TERRY BASKIN, CLAYTON TAX COMMISSIONERS OFFICE and others
ARGUETA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
DARWIN O. ARGUETA, KAREN N. ARIKPO, GREGORY S. ARRINGTON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Georgia Voter Alliance et al v. Pitts et al
as 1:2021cv00556
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Bernhard, Kevin McClelion, Georgia Voter Alliance and others
Defendant:
Robb Pitts, Lee Morris, Bob Ellis and others
Santry v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00457
Defendant:
Jesse A. Harris, Mark C. Adger, Bob Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Shawn Santry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Noble Finance Corp.
as 6:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Robby S. Arrington
Defendant:
Noble Finance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Henderson25 v. Florida State Hospital et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson25
Defendant:
Florida State Hospital, Sean Chamberlin, Vern Scarlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2017cv11996
Plaintiff:
Edwin S. Arrington and Bridget Arrington
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dates v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
Tavares Lashawn Dates
Defendant:
Dr. Wilson, Corizon Health and S. Arrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
