Cases 1 - 10 of 845
Brown v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65406
Plaintiff:
Takese S. Brown
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Nash et al
as 1:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Nkosi S. Brown
Defendant:
Dwayne A. Nash, Virtual Now and Harl Dum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. Brown Davis Interiors, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21396
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Mendez
Defendant:
Brown Davis Interiors, Inc., Todd D Davis and Robert S Brown
United States of America v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles S Brown, Charles Scott Brown Trust, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Brown v. Powers et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Monel S. Brown
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Powers, Golden Eagle Distributing Co. and Anheuser-Busch InBev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00841
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richard Yuengling, et al v. Rachel Floyd, et al
as 24-10249
Plaintiff:
RICHARD YUENGLING and REBECCA YUENGLING
Defendant:
RACHEL FLOYD, KURT S. BROWNING, RAY GADD and others
Hammons v. Peters et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Linda Gete, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
