Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MATTHEWS v. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK et al
as 2:2026cv00559
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, NATHAN DAY and TOWN OF BRUNSWICK
Plaintiff:
BROOKE MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez et al v. Day & Ross, Inc. et al
as 7:2026cv09668
Defendant:
John Doe and Day & Ross, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose M Jimenez and Deanella Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bryant v. Ranson et al
as 2:2026cv00699
Defendant:
Ofc. Fowler, Booking Ofc. Mickey, Booking Ofc. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Tyler v. Waddell Coe
as 26-7173
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL AUGUST, TRAVIS BOYKIN, inmate, SHANNON O'NEAL and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01410
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Maria Deytiquez, Terrance VonBank, Blaine T Mcguire and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Walker v. Scott et al
as 3:2026cv01590
Defendant:
Centurion of Indiana, LLC, Micheal Gapski, Kimberly Grandstaff and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael L Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Sequeira, et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 26-3736
Defendant:
Jason D. Saunders, Office of Attorney Ethics, James G. O'Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Helen D. Sequeira and Keith P. Sequeira
EISELE v. PRUETT et al
as 4:2026cv00298
Defendant:
GREG DAY and CLIFFORD SCOTT PRUETT
Plaintiff:
KELSEY D. EISELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
