Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Ramirez v. Ferguson
as 3:2023cv02618
Plaintiff:
Edgar-Raul Ramirez
Defendant:
Christopher S Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ferguson et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Ferguson and Catherine S. Ferguson
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Franco v. Ferguson
as 1:2022cv01584
Plaintiff:
Mr Henry A Franco and Henry Adalberto Franco
Defendant:
Maria S Furguson and Det. Maria S. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Daniels v. Saucedo
as 21-51193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melvin B. Daniels
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney Israel Saucedo, Barrett Daffin Frappier, Christopher S. Ferguson and others
Daniels v. Saucedo
as 21-50996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melvin B. Daniels
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney Israel Saucedo, Barrett Daffin Frappier, Turner & Engel, L.L.P. and others
Texas Farm Bureau v. n
as 21-50954
Petitioner:
In re: Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Farm Bureau Business Corporation, Texas Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and others
Respondent:
Christopher S. Ferguson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08403
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON S FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
David S. Ferguson
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FERGUSON v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2020cv02539
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, USPS and KOKOMO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KENNETH S. FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ferguson v. Ryan McDonough
as 20-2741
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH S. FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN MCDONOUGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
