Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Yates v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 6:2023cv06354
Plaintiff:
Candice S. Yates
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
David Annarelli v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JOSEPH ANNARELLI
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, KEVIN PUNTURI, Warden, Pocahontas State Correction Center, DR. MULLINS, MD, Pocahontas State Correction Center and others
Gallimore v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gallimore
Defendant:
Happy Smith, S. Yates, E. Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Yates
as 4:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Wayne Perry
Defendant:
S Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Haines et al
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris
Defendant:
Major Haines, Montgomery County Jail, Captain J. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duff et al v. Rosenberg et al
as 1:2021cv06756
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Duff, Receiver for the Estate of EquityBuild, Inc., EquityBuild Finance LLC and others
Defendant:
Mark L Rosenberg and Law Offices of Mark L. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MEYER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv15273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN MEYER
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, J. SALANITRO, S. YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 21-6637
Defendant / Appellee:
ART RIP, J. BENTLEY, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
