Cases 1 - 10 of 770
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuckerman v. Schilling et al
as 1:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Alan Zuckerman
Defendant:
Kimberly Schilling, Frank C Schilling and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SCHILLING v. MACDONALD et al
as 2:2024cv06680
Plaintiff:
MIKE SCHILLING
Defendant:
GUY MACDONALD, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C. GILMAN and others
Gonzalez v. Fraley & Schilling, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01261
Plaintiff:
James Gonzalez
Defendant:
Fraley & Schilling, Inc. and Matthew Thornburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Jeremy Blue v. Kirstie White, et al
as 24-1873
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
KIRSTIE WHITE, CARMEN SCHILLING, AMBER PLASTERER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Schill et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Robin S. Schill and Monique Schill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schilling v. Fuller
as 2:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Justin G. Schilling
Defendant:
Judge Randall Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sherman v. Kruse et al
as 2:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Janet Shellman Sherman
Defendant:
James A Kruse doing business as Island Pie Restaurant, Margaret Weidner, Dennis Schilling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Property Damage
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
