Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Teman v. MedPro Group Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03517
Defendant:
MedPro Group Inc., Attorney Protective, Scott Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Ari Teman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hart v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2026cv01701
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Hart
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, Jeremy Maki and Grant Stroud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward McKenney v. Ball, et al.
as 5:2026cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ashby Woodward McKenney
Defendant:
Scott Patrick Ball and Cheryl Denise Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
NELSON et al v. SHERIFF BOB JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv00973
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PATRICK NELSON and MARGIE NELSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF BOB JOHNSON and RAYMOND SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2025cv00004
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scott Patrick Bates v. Alpine Freight Lines, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02691
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Bates
Defendant:
Alpine Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence
McKinstry v. Diaz et al
as 5:2024cv08013
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield, Ron Davis, A. Pachynski and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick McKinstry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. USA
as 2:2024cv00245
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Scott Patrick Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kennedy v. Crews et al
as 0:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Kennedy
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, David Green, Lt. Nathan Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
