Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sharp v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv03574
Plaintiff:
Colton L Sharp
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Abbott v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2026cv00437
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Abbott
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee, Christina Brown and Alyssa Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Harpe, et al
as 26-7060
Plaintiff:
LO'RE PINK, AKA Johnny L. Hardeman
Defendant:
STEVEN HARPE, ELIZABETH SCHLUTER, R. GULBERT and others
Andress v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2026cv00222
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, ROBERT L. MAXA and others
Plaintiff:
Alan M. Andress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Oliver et al
as 4:2026cv00268
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Commisioner Tyrone Oliver, Former Commissioner Gregory Dozier, Former Commissioner Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Morgan v. Sharp et al
as 4:2026cv00457
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Durrah v. Campbell County et al
as 2:2026cv00256
Defendant:
Mara Donathon, Marlene Sharpe, Ryan Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Durrah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parra-Balandran (PS) v. Sharp
as 5:2026cv02313
Petitioner:
Alfonso Parra-Balandran
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
(HC) Mitchell v. Sharp
as 5:2026cv02309
Petitioner:
Paul Kristen Mitchell
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill et al v. Nunn et al
as 1:2026cv04936
Plaintiff:
Royal Hill and Rochelle Roberts
Defendant:
Dylan Nunn, Heather B. Sharp, Georgia Fern LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
