Cases 61 - 70 of 10,088
Dean v. The City of Saint Louis Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean
Defendant:
The City of Saint Louis Sheriffs Office, Neil Hogan, George Allen Crouch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bielefeldt et al
as 1:2024cv02471
Plaintiff:
Jake Bielefeldt and Simon Firestone
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Bielefeldt et al v. Gro Intelligence, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02472
Plaintiff:
Jake Bielefeldt and Simon Firestone
Defendant:
Gro Intelligence, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Bennett v. Molder et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Bobby Cleveland Bennett
Defendant:
Kevin Molder, Regina Hindman, Tabitha Simons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Smith
Defendant:
Carlos Sierra Garcia, Dinora Sierra, Dinora Sierra D/B/A Express Transport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quagliani v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Ray Quagliani
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
DE MORALES v. ALEMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
VANUZIA DE MORALES
Defendant:
SIMON MAYO ALEMAN and AMAYRA FONZ TELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Modere et al v. Deloof et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Modere, Inc. and Maple Mountain Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Amber DeLoof, DeBoss Marketing, Brynn Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Simon and Simon, PC, et al. v. Align Technology, Inc.
as 24-1703
Plaintiff:
SIMON AND SIMON, PC and VIP DENTAL SPAS
Defendant:
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
