Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Qasim v. Hackler et al
as 3:2021cv00223
Defendant:
John Carroll Hackler and Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Abdifahiz Qasim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Christopher Hoffman and Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Margie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2020cv01925
Plaintiff:
Margie Anderson
Defendant:
Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc. and Christopher Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF DANIEL COSMA et al v. UNITED CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03004
Plaintiff:
Anca Cosma, COSMA TRANS, INC. and ESTATE OF DANIEL COSMA
Defendant:
LTE TRUCKING, INC., E & B PAVING, LLC, STAN KOCH & SONS, TRUCKING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS)Nailen v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02226
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas Nailen, Tongue Teaser and Michael Douglas Nailen Formerly doing business as Tongue Teaser's Int'l Seafood, Inc.
Defendant:
Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2020cv01227
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, STAN KOCH & SONS TRUCKING, INC. and KOCH COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
TRACY JEAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GROSE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv04091
Plaintiff:
VERA M GROSE and VERA M. GROSE
Defendant:
JOSEPH G CLARK, STAN KOCH & SONS TRUCKING, INC. and JOSEPH G. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RLI Insurance Company v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
as 0:2019cv01757
Plaintiff:
RLI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antrim v. Glew et al
as 6:2019cv01157
Defendant:
Steve Glew and Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Antrim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
