Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCreary v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv11834
Plaintiff:
Carnell Michael McCreary
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Kym L. Worthy, James E. White and others
Sabree v. Mitchell
as 1:2019cv12454
Respondent:
Superintendent Lisa A. Mitchell
Petitioner:
G Saif Sabree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sabree v. Stirling
as 6:2017cv00075
Petitioner:
Muhsin Ahmad Sabree
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SABREE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06347
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SABREE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabree v. Nelson
as 1:2015cv10584
Petitioner:
Abdullah Sabree
Respondent:
Colonel Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sabree v. O'Dell, et al
as 13-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G. SAIF SABREE
Defendant:
ANTHONY MENDOSA, Superintendant Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center and CHRIS HYDE, Correctional Officer Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA M. O'DELL, Correctional Program Officer/Grievance Coordinator Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center, BRUCE GELB, Superintendent SBCC and PROPERTY OFFICER, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Sabree v. Mendosa et al
as 1:2012cv11742
Plaintiff:
G Saif Sabree
Defendant:
Anthony Mendosa, Christopher Hyde, Pamela O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKMAN v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv01256
Petitioner:
NAJEE SABREE BLACKMAN
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKMAN v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00540
Petitioner:
NAJEE SABREE Q. BLACKMAN
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sabree v. Ireland et al
as 4:2011cv40192
Defendant:
Roderick L. Ireland, Francis X. Spina, Judith A. Cowin and others
Plaintiff:
G. Saif Sabree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
